american

Like about 200 million other people around the world, my wife and I settled down to watch the American Idol Grand Finale earlier this week. With the benefit of satellite, we watched live from our tropical island home by the Sulu Sea in the Philippines. We were already happy, as our two favourites, Katherine McPhee and Taylor Hicks had, the previous evening, been where they belonged, singing in the final. Whoever won did not matter; we loved them both, but after Taylor Hicks final song, he did look the likely winner. However, they would both, as well as Chris Daughtry, have made worthy American Idols.

There were many memorable moments during the American Idol 2006 series, but for me one of the most memorable, and significant, came with the announcement of Taylor Hicks as the winner. I was delighted for him. He has been an inspirational entertainer all the way through the American Idol series, never flirting with the exit door (despite Simon Cowell’s attempts to shove him there), and with a unique ability to take just about any song, turn it into his own, and bring the audience to its feet. Taylor Hicks is…well, Taylor Hicks; never afraid to do his own thing and entertain the audience. Even if Simon Cowell wrote a funeral dirge, Taylor Hicks could turn it into something special with his unique character, and have the house rocking.

Taylor Hicks being announced as the winner was, of course, the peak of the series; it was what all the contestants had been aiming for since the auditions. However, for me there was something very special about that moment, that some may not have been so aware of: the reaction of Katherine McPhee. Her reaction was one of genuine delight for Taylor’s success. There were no artificial congratulations, no tears of disappointment, no sombre face because she had lost the final; just magnanimous delight for Taylor Hicks being voted American Idol 2006.

Katherine McPhee is a born star, and she will have a good singing career, a dream come true for her. Yet, despite her stunning beauty and exceptional singing talent, she remained modest even at the pinnacle of the show. In her own failure to win the contest, she simultaneously recognised with magnanimity the success of Taylor Hicks, and glowed in her own success of getting that far herself. She did not exude one iota of failure in her demeanour as the announcement was made. If anything, she epitomised success.

Seeing Katherine McPhee at that moment reminded me of how intermingled success and failure are. Even the same achievement can be viewed by one person as a success, and another as failure. No doubt there are some mean spirited people who will dismiss Katherine with a simple “oh, she was beaten, she failed.” But anyone who genuinely respects achievement of any type would appreciate what she has done to get as far as she has, and in such style.

The parents of Katherine McPhee must be very proud of what their daughter can do, has done, and will do in the future. But they should also be very proud of themselves for bringing up such a delightful young woman, who can take her moment of disappointment and turn it into a celebration of success, both for her and her conqueror, Taylor Hicks.

This success article was written by Roy Thomsitt, owner and part author of the Routes To Self Improvement website.

Tags: achieve success, American idol, failure, katherine mcphee, loser, Success, taylor hicks, winnerachieve success, American idol, failure, katherine mcphee, loser, Success, taylor hicks, winner

Share This

For the last century the system of political analyses has developed and created its theories and methods. Many of them can be applied not only to political analyses but to ethnological, social, cultural and others as well. That is why it is important to view this subject in the interdisciplinary aspect. It is an established fact that the times change not separately for one state or one social sphere. The changes in one state are connected with processes in other countries, and the changes in political life reflect themselves in all spheres of life of society: in culture, in economics, in philosophy, etc. Thus, the research is to be carried out viewing the process in the connection with all the processes happening in the society.

The crucial point of the International Relations study is the definition of the area of study, and it produces another problem - defining the unit of study. Different researchers take different units as the object of their study, and it brings to the differences in chosen methods. Thus, some focus on the state as the unit of study, some - on individual or global system. Since there is no unity in categories in international relations study it brings to the existing of different paradigms. We can say that the main problem is the problem of paradigm. In modern study of long -term change exist: Realism, Pluralist, Structuralism (or Globalism) paradigms. Some researchers point also at the new post-modernism paradigm.

According to K.R. Dark the long-term analyses function as means of discussing emergence and decline of states, international systems in global arena.
As K.R. Dark mentions, they are used to research such aspects as war-origins, nationalism, economical growth and decline, formation of national identity, role of environment, etc. There is a variety of these methods and Dark gives a good overview of them in his book.
K.R. Dark reviews the whole history of the Realism and points to the difference in the ideas of the scientists who share this theory. The classical study of realism is to be found in the works of Carr and Morgenthau. Besides, such researchers as Giplin, Modelski, Organski, and others studied the long-term change from the point of view of Realism.
Besides classical Realism there are other directions such as neo-Realism, structural Realism, but that only proves that the Realism used to be the basic method of study of international relations.
The Realism makes one state as the object of its study. In the international system the main is state-centric or anarchical approach. That means that the state is the main unit of study at it is viewed as the independent element that determines the changes, thus the interconnection of it with other states and its influence on the political change is given not so much importance as in the Structuralism and pluralism. The anarchical position means that there is no world government, so the progress is achieved by the competition of every state for emergence, this can be the reason of political conflicts and wars. Some specialists consider the wars the key to political change.

There is another opinion expressed by Giplin that the process of political development is determined by the stability of the state. Thus destabilization results in conflict and brings to changes.
Another researcher, Waltz bases his theory on rise and fall of great powers. It is also connected to the notion of “self-interest in action” where the great powers influence the development of state and its relations with other states on the basis of inter-state interests. This is where the cost-benefit analysis is applied as well.
The pluralism takes the state in the connection with its relations with other states as the unit of its study. Thus the paradigm of pluralism is broader than the one of realism. The interconnected states with common goals and interests represent more complicated object where the relations are determined by the complex of these interests and intentions, and political change happens as the result of the inner and inter correlation in the union of states. Here the unions and different associations of states can be studied at the historical material.
Structuralism (or globalism) views the international relations through the perspective of modern globalization and the tending of the states to merge into one politico-social and economical complex. Thus the relations between the states can be approached not as exterior relations of the state but as the interior ones of one global state and the political change depend on the development of the global society and its inner conflict.

Thus, the difference in paradigms of these main theories of long-term political change in the international relations determine the difference in the methods of investigation and brings to the various conclusions concerning the reasons and results of the political change. It is also complicated because of the connection of political life with the economical, social, cultural and other changes in the state and in the world.

research paper

custom essays

Custom written essays

Aaron is a professional freelance writer at custom essays writing service: custom-essay.net
He is also a technical writer, advertising copywriter, & website copywriter for Custom Essay Writing Service.

Tag: The History of American Foreign RelationsThe History of American Foreign Relations

Share This

Advantages and Disadvantages of Purchasing American Indian Art Online

Today’s society is one in which individuals look for the easiest ways to do things. This is most often seen with online shopping. A large number of individuals do not have time to spend the day shopping at their local mall; therefore, they shop online instead. Online shopping is a great way to obtain certain items, but what about American Indian art?

The presence of American Indian art is felt widely in the United States, but it is also popular in other areas of the world. This is why American Indian art is sold all around the world. There a large number of stores that sells American Indian art on and offline. If given the opportunity, many individuals would prefer to shop for American Indian art at a storefront location, but not all are able to do so.

Online American Indian art stores and gift shops have made it possible for individuals to purchase art online. Many online shoppers shop online to save time, but a large number do so because they do not have local access to an American Indian art store or gift shop. While shopping online for American Indian art can have advantages, it has disadvantages as well.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of shopping online for American Indian art is the selection. Most storefront American Indian art stores and gift shops are limited on the amount of space that they have. This means that when an individuals shop at an American Indian art store or gift shop there are only viewing a small percentage of the artwork available. Online stores do not always have this problem; therefore, they are able to have more art for sale.

Another benefit of shopping for American Indian art online is the money that can be saved. With online shopping, it is easy for an internet user to quickly compare prices. This has led many online stores to offer American Indian art at a lower price. The low price helps an online store stay in competition with other retailers. Individuals shopping for American Indian art online can take advantage of this by purchasing beautiful American Indian art for a discounted price.

While there are advantages of shopping online for American Indian art, there are disadvantages as well. One of the biggest disadvantages is the possibly of damaged items. When an item is ordered from an online store, the item can be damaged during shipping. It is advised that all online shoppers insure their products for shipping. It may also be a good idea to ask an online retailer about their shipping policies and packaging standards. Most online retailers will properly package your order, but why take the change with an expensive piece of American Indian art?

Another problem commonly found with online shopping is the authenticity of an item. The internet is amazing, but it has allowed a large number of individuals to open their own online stores. Just because someone claims an item is authentic American Indian art, does not really mean that it is. Purchasing American Indian art from an online auction website is how many individuals get scammed into purchasing American Indian art that is fake.

It is important to note that just about everything you do or purchase will have advantages and disadvantages. It is advised that you do not let disadvantages persuade you from purchasing American Indian art online. Taking the time to verify an online retailer’s reputation is a surefire way to make online shopping disadvantage-free.

Edward Charkow is the administrator for American Indian History. For more information
please visit http://www.americanindian-history.com

Tag: American Indian ArtAmerican Indian Art

Share This